Over the last week, the worldwide number of COVID-19 cases has continued to climb, reaching over 2.5 million, while deaths now number almost 180 000. One striking feature of the trajectory of the virus and the evolving public health response is the divergent trends across countries and continents that have appeared in recent days:
Of course, the ultimate game changer is the design and manufacture of an effective vaccine. Unfortunately, the consensus among experts – and hence our baseline view up to this point – has been that a vaccine is unlikely to become available until 2021. Among other things, it will take time to ensure the vaccine is free of any damaging side-effects and then manufacture it on an industrial scale.
Recent announcements by scientists at the Oxford Vaccine Group and the Jenner Institute are therefore significant in our view. Professor Sarah Gilbert argues that there is an 80% chance that her team’s project will succeed. Her colleague, Professor Adam Hill, has set a ‘fairly modest target’ of producing at least a million doses of the vaccine by about September, after which “It’s pretty clear the world is going to need hundreds of millions of doses, ideally by the end of this year”.
We think it is too early to make these predictions for our base case for the end-phase of the pandemic, but the progress of the Oxford team is clearly a major signpost.
Turning to the macroeconomic data and the arrival of information on the scale of the economic contraction ahead, we highlight two pieces of information:
Finally, the focus on the policy front this week is on the EU Council meeting on 23 April and the discussions over the common European response to financing crisis measures. Europe does appear to be coalescing around basic principles – in particular, to use the EU’s budget (specifically, the Multi-annual Financial Framework (MFF)) and hence the issuance of Eurobonds.
An informal Spanish position paper on the precise calibration is, in our view, encouraging. We think it would fit the bill in terms of the size of the fund envisaged, the terms of the financing, the provision of support through grants and on the basis of need. However, there is no guarantee that the leaders will agree on this or any other proposal this week.
After having extended a rally that had led them to recover over half the fall sustained in March, US stocks yesterday fell by 3.1%. This was their worst day since 1 April. Given the extent of the recent rally, a correction was due as markets assess the damage to prospects for the economy and earnings along with the risk of new outbreaks.
A further slump in oil prices in recent days is also weighing on sentiment as it reflects demand destruction for oil caused by locking down a major part of the global economy.
In Europe, Italy’s 10-year government bond yield has this week climbed to above 2% for the first time in a month, while the risk premium over German bonds has widened to 2.6%. That is not far short of the peak of 2.8% during the March sell-off.
We expect EU member states to continue their marathon talks after tomorrow’s Council Meeting to search for a compromise on how to finance the economic reconstruction. The poor economic and inflation outlook, combined with the ECB’s asset purchase programmes, should keep government bond yields low, and contain ‘peripheral’ eurozone bond spreads.
In summary, this week’s correction in equity markets comes after a sharp rally. We see it as providing an opportunity to tactically add risk in multi-asset portfolios. Our signposts continue to suggest to us that this is no time to sell risky assets. We continue to seek opportunities to add to our risk positions.
Any views expressed here are those of the author as of the date of publication, are based on available information, and are subject to change without notice. Individual portfolio management teams may hold different views and may take different investment decisions for different clients.
The value of investments and the income they generate may go down as well as up and it is possible that investors will not recover their initial outlay. Past performance is no guarantee for future returns.
Investing in emerging markets, or specialised or restricted sectors is likely to be subject to a higher-than-average volatility due to a high degree of concentration, greater uncertainty because less information is available, there is less liquidity or due to greater sensitivity to changes in market conditions (social, political and economic conditions).
Some emerging markets offer less security than the majority of international developed markets. For this reason, services for portfolio transactions, liquidation and conservation on behalf of funds invested in emerging markets may carry greater risk.
Investments in the aforementioned fund are subject to market fluctuation and risks inherent in investing in securities. The value of investments and the revenue they generate can increase or decrease and it is possible that investors will not recover their initial investment. Source: BNP Paribas Asset Management Holding.